laptop i7 8750h gtx 1050

Jun 20, 2022 · GTX 1050 Ti Mac Mobile Phone Jun 22, 2022 #3 trs96 said: HD4600 is fully supported. Use the Macmini 7,1 SMBIOS which still has support and uses the related Haswell HD5000 graphics. Monterey will be as far as that support goes. For this reason, the Core i7 8850H and 8750H earn our top pick for the best processors for laptops out there. Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Extreme Display: 15.6" 4K CPU: Intel Core i7 8850H GPU: 300 Result For gtx 1050 i7 8750h. gtx 1050 i7 8750h gtx 1050 i7 8750h [[${searchVo.searchTotal + ' Result For ' + searchVo.searchKey}]] PC & TABLETS PHONES SERVERS & STORAGE SMART DEVICES Premium traditional laptop with 14" QHD+ touchscreen display. Laptop Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G negra 15.6", Intel Core i7 8750H 8GB de RAM 1TB HDD, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 1920x1080px Windows 10 Home Este producto no está disponible por el momento. Lo que tienes que saber de este producto Dell Inspiron 15-7591 15.6" FHD, i7-9750H, 8GB, 512GB SSD, GTX1050, W10H, Silver $1,499.99 $799.99 See More Recommendations Overview Q&A About Dell G5 Series 15 5587 G5 5587 Fun laptop for games and work. Have had an excellent experience from the very beginning with the salesperson to marathon gaming sessions. Highly recommend. mengapa keragaman agama tidak boleh menjadi penghambat dalam pergaulan jelaskan. Date Published 18 Dec 2020 Intel Core i7-8750H NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB GDDR5 Full HD 1920 x 1080, IPS 1000GB HDD 8GB DDR4 kg lbs Pros Good battery life Good cooling system No PWM to control screen brightness LGD053F Comfortable port position slot for PCIe x4 NVMe SSD Cons Low sRGB coverage LGD053F All plastic build Specs HDD/SSD 1TB HDD RAM 8GB DDR4 OS Windows 10 Home Dimensions 380 x 258 x mm x x Weight kg lbs Ports and connectivity 1x USB Type-A Gen 1 5 Gbps 1x USB Type-A Gen 1 5 Gbps 1x USB Type-A HDMI Card Reader SD, SDHC, SDXC Ethernet LAN Gigabit Ethernet Wi-Fi Bluetooth Audio jack combo audio / microphone jack Features Fingerprint reader Web camera HD 720p Backlit keyboard Microphone Dual-Array Microphone Speakers Waves MaxxAudio Pro stereo speakers Optical drive Security Lock slot Noble lock Spill-resistant keyboard 2x RAM slots There are 17 laptops with the same specs, All brands sorted by price CommissionsEarned More Dell G3 3579 configurations - 1 laptops CommissionsEarned Dell G3 3579 in-depth review Dell's new G series is aimed at gamers and the G3 15 3579 is actually the company's most affordable gaming solution. With a variety of available configurations, you can customize yours to be a truly affordable entry to the gaming world or a solid mid-range gaming notebook. With the G3 15 3579, you will get to choose between the latest eight generation Intel CPUs including the six-core Core i7-8750H and a range of NVIDIA's 10 series GPUs. However, there are some compromises made to keep the price low. You shouldn't expect ASUS ROG or Alienware build quality and design from a notebook that barely crosses the $1000 mark when offered with its top specs. You may want to take a look into our detailed review of its bigger brother - the Dell G5 15 5587. You can check the prices and co[...] Read the full review CPU Performance Intel Core i7-8750H 3D Rendering Results are from the Cinebench 20 CPU test the higher the score, the better GPU Performance NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB GDDR5 3DMark Fire Strike G Results are for the 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics benchmark the higher the score, the better LaptopMedia is a fully independent company. Almost all of the reviewed products come from online stores, instead of using review samples provided by the manufacturers. Our opinions are based on tests from our laboratory. Contact Us © LaptopMedia Ltd. - Some Rights Reserved. Caffeine boost. The Asus GL703GE packs in more processor performance than ever thanks to Intel’s new Core i7-8750H CPU. The Coffee Lake chip is a shot in the arm for processor-reliant tasks, and the 120 Hz display has been improved. Still, the price makes the GL703GE hard to Lake is here, and with new processors come several new changes. Intel's six-core Core i7-8750H replaces the venerable Core i7-7700HQ. The new CPU adds two more cores and four more threads. As usual, Asus is among the first to push Intel’s new silicon with their ROG line of gaming laptops. The GL703GE under review today is reflective of what is sure to become the standard configuration for mid-tier gaming laptops this year at least until Nvidia's new Volta GPUs hit the market. One would expect to see a 50% increase in processor performance to match the 50% increase in core count. We'll see whether or not this hypothesis holds true. In addition to the Core i7-8750H, the GL703GE packs a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and 120 Hz panel, which may be enticing to competitive gamers looking for a decisive edge in popular multiplayer titles like DOTA 2 and CS GO. Since the GL703GE is essentially a retooling of the GL703VM, we will forego discussion of the exterior factors of the notebook in favor of focusing on the performance benefits brought by Coffee Lake. For details on the case and keyboard, please refer to our review of the Asus ROG Strix GL703VM. At $1250 MSRP, consumers are definitely paying for the new and improved CPU. We will see how the GL703GE compares to its older brother, the Asus Strix GL703VM. Some other competitors include the HP Omen 17 GTX 1050 Ti, MSI GE72, and MSI GP62. We'll also examine how the Core i7-8750H compares to other high-end CPUs like AMD's Ryzen 7 1700 and Intel's Kaby Lake G Core i5-8305G. Let's down this cup of joe and see if the premium is worth GB , MHz, DDR4-2666 / PC4-21300 inch 169, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Chi Mei CMN1747, TN, glossy noStorageKingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, 128 GB , 128 GB PCIe NVMe SSD + 1 TB HDD, 1049 GB freeSoundcardIntel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS Audio, Voice, SpeechConnections5 USB / Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections Combo audio in/out, Card Reader SD/SDHC/SDXC Card Reader, Brightness SensorNetworkingRealtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN 10/100/1000MBit/s, Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi WiFi a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/, Bluetooth x width x depth in mm x 415 x 280 = x x inBattery64 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4-cellOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Home 64 BitAdditional featuresSpeakers 2x 2 W, Keyboard Chiclet, Keyboard Light yes, ROG Gaming Center, 12 Months kg = oz / 6 pounds, Power Supply 625 g = oz / poundsNote The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. MSI GE72 7RE-046 HP Omen 17-w206ng Asus GL703GE-ES73 MSI GV72 7RD-1048XPL MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 DIN A4 ❌420 mm / inch 288 mm / inch 32 mm / inch 3 lbs416 mm / inch 279 mm / 11 inch 30 mm / inch lbs415 mm / inch 280 mm / 11 inch mm / inch kg6 lbs383 mm / inch 260 mm / inch 29 mm / inch lbs358 mm / inch 248 mm / inch 18 mm / inch lbs356 mm / 14 inch 250 mm / inch 18 mm / inch lbs297 mm / inch 210 mm / inch 1 mm / inch lbsSubpixel arrayThe AU Optronics panel is a definite improvement over the older GL703VM's. While it keeps the same 120 Hz refresh rate, color accuracy and coverage are much better. The GL703GE manages to capture almost the entire sRGB gamut and about 75% of the AdobeRGB gamut. Colors look vibrant across the panel. Most colors are accurate, although greens have a bit of a wider variance. Color temperature also has a slight blue shift to it. This isn't noticeable in most images, but whites have an aqua hue. There is also a slight graininess visible on white screens, something that is common to matte displays. This isn't distracting unless viewing the screen from about 8 inches or closer. In sum, the panel is excellent for a mid-tier laptop. Users can benefit from a fast refresh rate without the sacrifices to color accuracy and picture quality typically seen in cheaper HFR displays. Distribution of brightnessChi Mei CMN1747X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum cd/m² Nits Average cd/m² Minimum cd/m²Brightness Distribution 86 %Center on Battery cd/m²Contrast 10681 Black cd/m²ΔE Color calibrated Greyscale sRGB Argyll 3D75% AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D sRGB Argyll 3D Display P3 Argyll 3DGamma GL703GE-ES73Chi Mei CMN1747, TN, 1920x1080Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74AU Optronics IPS, 1920x1080HP Omen 17-w206ngChi Mei CMN1738, IPS, 1920x1080MSI GE72 7RE-046N173HHE-G32 CMN1747, TN LED, 1920x1080Display-23%-17%1% Display P3 -32% -25% 1% sRGB -13% -7% 0% AdobeRGB 1998 -25% -19% 3%Response Times-172%-174%-68% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * ?6, ? ?20, 18-228%27 ?13, 14-133% Response Time Black / White * ?6, ? ? ?6, 3-2% PWM Frequency26040 ?25200 ?95-99%Screen-17%-12%-24%Brightness -4%318 -4%253 -24%Brightness312293 -6%295 -5%230 -26%Brightness Distribution8667 -22%79 -8%86 0%Black Level * -110% 19% 23%Contrast1068492 -54%1272 19%1054 -1%Colorchecker dE 2000 * -11% -64% -75%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * 16% -39% -64%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * dE 2000 * 63%5 -16% -69% 97% 99% 96% 105%CCT7034 92%6668 97%7374 88%6329 103%Color Space Percent of AdobeRGB 19987556 -25%61 -19%76 1%Color Space Percent of sRGB10087 -13%93 -7%100 0%Total Average Program / Settings-71% / -39%-68% / -44%-30% / -24%* ... smaller is better Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry ghosting. Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise↘ ms fallThe screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 240 maximum ms. » 16 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices ms. ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise↘ ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 636 maximum ms. » 17 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices 35 ms. Screen Flickering / PWM Pulse-Width ModulationℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation PWM . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering flickering / PWM detected 26040 Hz ≤ 25 % brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz Likely utilizing PWM Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any comparison 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19200 minimum 5 - maximum 3846000 Hz was measured. Hexa-core is the new quad-core; similar to how most gaming laptops used Intel's quad-core Core i7-7700HQ throughout last year, we can expect most new gaming devices to come with the six-core Core i7-8750H. Does a 50% bump in core count equal a 50% bump in multi-threaded performance? Not quite, but CPU tasks finish faster, particularly those that demand multiple threads. Additionally, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a solid choice to match the other components; while it struggles to push 60 fps in demanding games at the highest settings, it is poised to take advantage of the 120 Hz display in certain competitive multiplayer a doubt, the GL703GE's headliner is the Core i7-8750H, a new hexa-core chip from Intel. The 45 W TDP matches that of the previous generation i7-7700HQ, but clock speeds have been tweaked. The 8750H has a lower base clock than its older brother GHz vs GHz but is able to boost a fair bit higher on a single core GHz vs. GHz. That should make for better single core performance, and that is indeed what we see in Cinebench R15 the 8750H edges out the 7700HQ by about 15%. Multi-threaded performance is, as expected, a blowout. The 8750H trumps the 7700HQ by about 40%, which closely matches the bump in physical cores. Interestingly, the Asus GL703GE comes in about 7% lower in multi-threaded tests than other 8750H-based systems. This could be due to either throttling in our system or performance-focused tweaking in others; as of this writing, the chip is too new to make that call. This may be something to watch. Over the long term, the 8750H has a performance curve akin to what we're used to seeing in our Cinebench R15 loop test. The machine comes charging out of the gates for the first pass only to dip during the second. Performance is henceforth stable with no noteworthy variance. For more information about the Intel Core i7-8750H, please see our dedicated CPU page here. 0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020TooltipCinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64BitAverage of class Gaming - 312, n=244, last 2 years 251 Points ∼77% +54%Microsoft Surface Book 2 15Intel Core i7-8650U 178 Points ∼54% +9%Gigabyte Aero 15X v8Intel Core i7-8750H 175 Points ∼53% +7%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 163 - 177, n=86 172 Points ∼52% +6%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52Intel Core i5-8300H 166 Points ∼51% +2%Asus GL703GE-ES73Intel Core i7-8750H 163 Points ∼50% Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GIntel Core i5-8305G 157 Points ∼48% -4%MSI GV72 7RD-1048XPLIntel Core i5-7300HQ 149 Points ∼45% -9%Asus GL702ZC-GC104TAMD Ryzen 7 1700 144 Points ∼44% -12%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74Intel Core i7-7700HQ 142 Points ∼43% -13%Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 141 Points ∼43% -13%Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204TAMD Ryzen 5 1600 140 Points ∼43% -14% CPU Multi 64BitAverage of class Gaming 400 - 5663, n=243, last 2 years 2608 Points ∼27% +156%Asus GL702ZC-GC104TAMD Ryzen 7 1700 1408 Points ∼15% +38%Gigabyte Aero 15X v8Intel Core i7-8750H 1133 Points ∼12% +11%Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204TAMD Ryzen 5 1600 1129 Points ∼12% +11%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 863 - 1251, n=93 1113 Points ∼11% +9%Asus GL703GE-ES73Intel Core i7-8750H 1020 Points ∼11% Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52Intel Core i5-8300H 801 Points ∼8% -21%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74Intel Core i7-7700HQ 714 Points ∼7% -30%Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GIntel Core i5-8305G 710 Points ∼7% -30%Microsoft Surface Book 2 15Intel Core i7-8650U 675 Points ∼7% -34%Microsoft Surface Book 2 15Intel Core i7-8650U 657 Points ∼7% -36%Microsoft Surface Book 2 15Intel Core i7-8650U 649 Points ∼7% -36%Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 566 Points ∼6% -45%MSI GV72 7RD-1048XPLIntel Core i5-7300HQ 516 Points ∼5% -49%Cinebench CPU Single 64BitAverage of class Gaming - n=24, last 2 years Points ∼14% +122%Gigabyte Aero 15X v8Intel Core i7-8750H Points ∼6% +3%Average Intel Core i7-8750H - 2, n=40 Points ∼6% +2%Asus GL703GE-ES73Intel Core i7-8750H Points ∼6% Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52Intel Core i5-8300H Points ∼6% -4%Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GIntel Core i5-8305G Points ∼6% -7%Asus GL702ZC-GC104TAMD Ryzen 7 1700 Points ∼5% -15%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74Intel Core i7-7700HQ Points ∼5% -16%Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9AMD Ryzen 7 2700U Points ∼5% -18%Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204TAMD Ryzen 5 1600 Points ∼5% -19% CPU Multi 64BitAverage of class Gaming 11 - n=24, last 2 years Points ∼45% +189%Asus GL702ZC-GC104TAMD Ryzen 7 1700 Points ∼22% +41%Gigabyte Aero 15X v8Intel Core i7-8750H Points ∼18% +16%Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204TAMD Ryzen 5 1600 Points ∼18% +12%Average Intel Core i7-8750H - n=41 Points ∼17% +9%Asus GL703GE-ES73Intel Core i7-8750H Points ∼16% Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52Intel Core i5-8300H Points ∼11% -31%Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GIntel Core i5-8305G Points ∼11% -33%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74Intel Core i7-7700HQ Points ∼10% -36%Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9AMD Ryzen 7 2700U Points ∼8% -47%Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32BitAverage of class Gaming 30491 - 85088, n=24, last 2 years 52989 Points ∼38% +70%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 29664 - 35307, n=25 33163 Points ∼24% +6%Asus GL703GE-ES73Intel Core i7-8750H 31254 Points ∼23% Asus GL702ZC-GC104TAMD Ryzen 7 1700 29330 Points ∼21% -6%Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204TAMD Ryzen 5 1600 25561 Points ∼19% -18%Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GIntel Core i5-8305G 21845 Points ∼16% -30%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74Intel Core i7-7700HQ 19801 Points ∼14% -37%Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 13729 Points ∼10% -56% Rendering Single 32BitAverage of class Gaming 5847 - 11940, n=24, last 2 years 8368 Points ∼51% +33%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 6236 - 6645, n=25 6479 Points ∼39% +3%Asus GL703GE-ES73Intel Core i7-8750H 6292 Points ∼38% Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GIntel Core i5-8305G 5844 Points ∼35% -7%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74Intel Core i7-7700HQ 5426 Points ∼33% -14%Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 4515 Points ∼27% -28%Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204TAMD Ryzen 5 1600 4330 Points ∼26% -31%Asus GL702ZC-GC104TAMD Ryzen 7 1700 4286 Points ∼26% -32%wPrime - 1024m Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204TAMD Ryzen 5 1600 s * ∼4% -120%MSI GV72 7RD-1048XPLIntel Core i5-7300HQ s * ∼4% -118%Average of class Gaming - 1021, n=9, last 2 years 340 s * ∼4% -112%Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9AMD Ryzen 7 2700U s * ∼3% -67%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74Intel Core i7-7700HQ 247 s * ∼3% -54%Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GIntel Core i5-8305G s * ∼3% -35%Asus GL703GE-ES73Intel Core i7-8750H s * ∼2% Average Intel Core i7-8750H - n=6 s * ∼2% +2%* ... smaller is betterCinebench R10 Shading 32Bit7051 Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit31254 Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit6292 Cinebench OpenGL fps Cinebench CPU Multi Points Cinebench CPU Single Points Cinebench R15 Ref. Match % Cinebench R15 OpenGL fps Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit1020 Points Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit163 Points HelpOverall system performance is good. The GL703GE keeps up with other devices in its class. There is a noticeable hiccup when opening a new Windows Explorer window; the process takes almost a full second. Otherwise, every app opens without pause, and the rest of the system responds 8 Home Score Accelerated v2Average of class Gaming 3570 - 6657, n=42, last 2 years 5109 Points ∼77% +23%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172 4757 Points ∼71% +15%Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GVega M GL / 870, i5-8305G, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 4693 Points ∼70% +13%Gigabyte Aero 15X v8GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 4504 Points ∼68% +9%Asus GL702ZC-GC104TRadeon RX 580 Laptop, R7 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 4173 Points ∼63% +1%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 3894 - 4371, n=10 4162 Points ∼63% 0%Asus GL703GE-ES73GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 4148 Points ∼62% Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9Vega 10, R7 2700U, Micron SSD 1100 SED 512GB, MTFDDAV512TBN 3640 Points ∼55% -12%Microsoft Surface Book 2 15GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 3601 Points ∼54% -13% Work Score Accelerated v2Average of class Gaming 4622 - 7085, n=41, last 2 years 5991 Points ∼84% +13%Gigabyte Aero 15X v8GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 5676 Points ∼80% +7%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 4973 - 5461, n=10 5312 Points ∼75% 0%Asus GL703GE-ES73GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 5288 Points ∼74% Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GVega M GL / 870, i5-8305G, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 5134 Points ∼72% -3%Asus GL702ZC-GC104TRadeon RX 580 Laptop, R7 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 5110 Points ∼72% -3%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172 4877 Points ∼69% -8%Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9Vega 10, R7 2700U, Micron SSD 1100 SED 512GB, MTFDDAV512TBN 4774 Points ∼67% -10%Microsoft Surface Book 2 15GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 4544 Points ∼64% -14% Creative Score Accelerated v2Average of class Gaming 5206 - 10574, n=25, last 2 years 6927 Points ∼59% +32%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172 6519 Points ∼56% +24%Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GVega M GL / 870, i5-8305G, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 6303 Points ∼54% +20%Asus GL703GE-ES73GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 5254 Points ∼45% Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 4820 - 5255, n=4 5092 Points ∼44% -3%Microsoft Surface Book 2 15GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 5065 Points ∼43% -4%Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9Vega 10, R7 2700U, Micron SSD 1100 SED 512GB, MTFDDAV512TBN 4014 Points ∼34% -24% PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 4148 pointsPCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 5254 pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 5288 pointsPCMark 10 Score 4532 pointsHelp Drive speeds are adequate. The 128 GB SSD has good read times but is surprisingly sluggish when writing data. Despite being connected via a PCIe bridge, the SSD is more akin to a SATA drive than one using the NVMe protocol. In light of other options, like the Samsung PM961, the SSD is decent but will seem slow to some. The paltry 128 GB of storage also fills up incredibly quickly and might become a headache to manage. There is a drive bay that our model uses to house a 1 TB HDD. This mechanical drive is reliable and fairly quick for an GL703GE-ES73Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJHP Omen 17-w206ngSamsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHPMSI GE72 7RE-046Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NYGigabyte Aero 15X v8Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GToshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256GAS SSD Copy Game MB/ -27% Copy Program MB/ 72% Copy ISO MB/ -11% Score Total6342172 243%969 53%2536 300%1113 76% Score Write196165 -16%324 65%939 379%307 57% Score Read3111390 347%424 36%1092 251%595 91% Access Time Write * -2587% 54% 34% 20% Access Time Read * 79% 56% 56% 46% 4K-64 12% 51%742 540% 56% 4K-64 470% 82%847 339% 75% 4K -98% 72% 36% 57% 4K 158% 13% 23% 31% Seq 63% 123%1163 447% 57% Seq Read9932399 142%515 -48%2213 123%2335 135%* ... smaller is betterCDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1 1406 MB/s CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1 MB/s CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1 MB/s CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1 202 MB/s CDM 5 Write Seq MB/s CDM 5/6 Read 4K MB/s CDM 5/6 Write 4K MB/s Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has made several appearances in mid-tier gaming laptops and has frequently shown itself to be an excellent value for the performance it offers. The GL703GE performs about as well as other devices sporting the 1050 Ti and hits similar numbers in Fire Strike. As a result, the story here is largely the same; the 1050 Ti is well-suited for moderately demanding 3D workloads but hits its limits when details are turned up. Full HD is as far as the GPU should be pushed. Users that need more power from their GPU should look to the GTX 1060, which is about 50% faster, or the GTX 1070 Max-Q, which is almost twice as fast. However, both of these GPUs will pull more power and generate more heat than the 75 Watt 1050 Ti. On battery, the GL703GE sees a 10% drop in GPU performance. For more information about the GTX 1050 Ti, please refer to our GPU page 111280x720 Performance GPUAverage of class Gaming 1029 - 72070, n=235, last 2 years 36582 Points ∼31% +301%Asus Zephyrus M GM501NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H 21925 Points ∼19% +140%Gigabyte Aero 15X v8NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H 19162 Points ∼16% +110%Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204TAMD Radeon RX 580 Laptop, R5 1600 15182 Points ∼13% +66%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ 15145 Points ∼13% +66%Microsoft Surface Book 2 15NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8650U 14254 Points ∼12% +56%Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GAMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G 9862 Points ∼8% +8%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 8304 - 10402, n=36 9591 Points ∼8% +5%Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H 9360 Points ∼8% +3%Asus GL703GE-ES73NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H 9128 Points ∼8% Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGEAMD Radeon RX 560 Laptop, i5-7300HQ 8345 Points ∼7% -9%Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U 7640 Points ∼7% -16%Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U 3728 Points ∼3% -59%Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 IrisIntel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7560U 2124 Points ∼2% -77%1280x720 Performance CombinedAverage of class Gaming 1251 - 26358, n=234, last 2 years 18176 Points ∼59% +106%Asus Zephyrus M GM501NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H 11707 Points ∼38% +33%Gigabyte Aero 15X v8NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H 9720 Points ∼32% +10%Asus GL703GE-ES73NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H 8828 Points ∼29% Microsoft Surface Book 2 15NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8650U 8135 Points ∼27% -8%Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204TAMD Radeon RX 580 Laptop, R5 1600 7838 Points ∼26% -11%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 6104 - 9172, n=35 7823 Points ∼26% -11%Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GAMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G 7788 Points ∼25% -12%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ 7358 Points ∼24% -17%Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U 6889 Points ∼22% -22%Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGEAMD Radeon RX 560 Laptop, i5-7300HQ 5933 Points ∼19% -33%Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U 2734 Points ∼9% -69%Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 IrisIntel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7560U 1838 Points ∼6% -79%3DMark1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 15902 - 192520, n=169, last 2 years 122595 Points ∼32% +143%Asus Zephyrus M GM501NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H 115638 Points ∼30% +129%Gigabyte Aero 15X v8NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H 104942 Points ∼28% +108%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ 82913 Points ∼22% +64%Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204TAMD Radeon RX 580 Laptop, R5 1600 70020 Points ∼18% +39%Asus GL703GE-ES73NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H 50514 Points ∼13% Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 43721 - 53978, n=37 50013 Points ∼13% -1%Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GAMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G 44796 Points ∼12% -11%Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGEAMD Radeon RX 560 Laptop, i5-7300HQ 36528 Points ∼10% -28%Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U 36413 Points ∼10% -28%Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U 15613 Points ∼4% -69%Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 IrisIntel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7560U 11232 Points ∼3% -78%1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 781 - 53059, n=242, last 2 years 27061 Points ∼31% +240%Asus Zephyrus M GM501NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H 17046 Points ∼19% +114%Gigabyte Aero 15X v8NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H 15156 Points ∼17% +91%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ 12038 Points ∼14% +51%Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204TAMD Radeon RX 580 Laptop, R5 1600 11512 Points ∼13% +45%Microsoft Surface Book 2 15NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8650U 10708 Points ∼12% +35%Asus GL703GE-ES73NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H 7953 Points ∼9% Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 6792 - 8376, n=38 7743 Points ∼9% -3%Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GAMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G 7355 Points ∼8% -8%Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U 6042 Points ∼7% -24%Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGEAMD Radeon RX 560 Laptop, i5-7300HQ 5738 Points ∼6% -28%Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U 2442 Points ∼3% -69%Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 IrisIntel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7560U 1369 Points ∼2% -83%1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 46258 - 613731, n=21, last 2 years 279777 Points ∼38% +26%Asus GL703GE-ES73NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H 221173 Points ∼30% Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ 196751 Points ∼27% -11%Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GAMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G 165559 Points ∼23% -25%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 71804 - 221173, n=18 128005 Points ∼18% -42% 3DMark 06 Standard Score 32246 points3DMark 11 Performance 9097 points3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score 131234 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score 25678 points3DMark Fire Strike Score 7074 points3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score 3602 pointsHelp As stated, the GTX 1050 Ti is a popular choice for mid-tier gaming laptops, and with good reason. The 1050 Ti can push through most titles at FHD/Medium settings. The GL703GE seems particularly aimed at competitive gamers, and the 1050 Ti is a good step toward that goal. Most AAA games will need reduced settings to hit 60 frames per second, but competitive games which are typically lighter on system resources can easily exceed 60 fps with everything turned up. This is where the other killer feature of the GL703GE, the 120 Hz display, steps in. Games like Counter-Strike GO and Rocket League can be pushed past 100 fps, taking full advantage of the panel's higher refresh rate. These games look and feel buttery smooth, and the twitch reactions needed to remain competitive in these games come that much GL703GE's components perform remarkably well under both synthetic and real-world testing. During Prime95, the CPU does reasonably well, averaging GHz across all cores. CPU Temperatures are impressive and never eclipse 70° C during the test. Furmark is also handled well; the GPU hovers around 1450 MHz while staying relatively cool at 68° C. While CPU and GPU performance seems a bit restrictive under synthetic load, the lower temperatures may be a worthy payoff. Under real-world stress running The Witcher 3 for an hour, the system still keeps its cool. Both the CPU and GPU perform admirably. The CPU hangs at about GHz with intermittent spikes up to 4 GHz. Temperatures average at 70° C, but we did observe occasional pops to 87° C. The GPU holds at a rock solid 1721 MHz throughout the test and consistently remains at 70° C. Both of these metrics are excellent. Performance over the hour-long run is stable and follows the same FPS curve we've seen in other machines. 012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728TooltipThe Witcher 3 ultra CPU Clock GHz GPU Clock MHz Average CPU Temperature °C Average GPU Temperature °C Prime95 Stress - 66 - FurMark Stress 1444 64 68 Prime95 + FurMark Stress 1425 85 82 Witcher 3 Stress 1721 70 70 In order to keep the components as cool as it does under load, the GL703GE has to expel quite a bit of heat from its thin chassis. Fan noise, as a consequence, can get loud. Under full stress, the dual fan setup hits 49 dBA, which is noticeable across a room. However, the level pitch makes the noise less grating than other thin gaming notebooks, which typically sound shrill under load. The GL703GE's fan curve is fairly aggressive; the fans ramp up quickly, usually within 5 minutes of starting a game, and stay at a constant "full blast" until several minutes after the system returns to idle. Even so, the GL703GE's fans are quieter than many other thin gaming laptops; of note, the HP Omen 17 hits 52 dBA during long gaming sessions. There is no noticeable coil whine or other system noise. Noise Level Idle / 30 / 32 dBALoad 36 / dBA 30 dBsilent40 dBAaudible50 dBAloud min , med , max BK Precision 732A 15 cm distance environment noise dBAAsus GL703GE-ES73GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJAsus Strix GL703VM-DB74GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172HP Omen 17-w206ngGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHPMSI GE72 7RE-046GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NYMSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth ThinGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQGigabyte Aero 15X v8GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7MSI GV72 7RD-1048XPLGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, ADATA SX7000NP 128 GBDell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GVega M GL / 870, i5-8305G, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256GAcer Nitro 5 AN515-52GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300HNoise-3%-13%-12%-2%-10%-1%6%off / environment * -1%30 -6%30 -6%30 -6%29 -3% 1%Idle Minimum * -7%34 -21%34 -21%30 -6%30 -6% -10% 1%Idle Average * -1%35 -17%35 -17%31 -3%31 -3% -4% 7%Idle Maximum * 6%36 -13%36 -13%34 -6%35 -9% 3% 13%Load Average * -7%47 -31%41 -14%43 -19%49 -36% -8%35 3%Witcher 3 ultra * -2%48 2%42 14%51 -5% 9%Load Maximum * -12%52 -7%49 -0%44 10%54 -11% 13% 9%* ... smaller is betterHeat exhaust during temperatures paint an interesting picture. There are a few hot spots that quickly grow uncomfortably warm during heavy workloads, but these spots shouldn't come into contact with the user. For instance, the vent above the keyboard hits 63° C, but unless a hand is intentionally placed on this spot, this heat won't be felt. The center of the keyboard around the "I," "O," and "9" keys can feel a bit toasty, but these aren't keys typically used during gameplay. The bottom panel near the rear vents will be uncomfortable, so gaming on a desk is recommended. When idle or during light workloads, the machine remains close to room temperature with no noticeable warm spots. °C103 °C137 °C103 F 30 °C86 °C127 °C87 F °C73 °C72 F22 °C72 F Maximum °C = 137 FAverage °C = 95 F °C139 °C132 °C129 °C85 F45 °C113 °C92 F25 °C77 °C78 °C81 F Maximum °C = 139 FAverage °C = 103 F Power Supply max. °C = 117 F Room Temperature °C = 69 F Fluke 62 Mini± The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is °C / 95 F, compared to the average of °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.- The maximum temperature on the upper side is °C / 137 F, compared to the average of °C / 105 F, ranging from to °C for the class Gaming.- The bottom heats up to a maximum of °C / 139 F, compared to the average of °C / 110 F+ In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of °C / 93 F.± Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of °C / 93 F.+ The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of °C / F and are therefore cool to the touch. + The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was °C / 84 F + °C / F. Asus GL703GE-ES73GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJAsus Strix GL703VM-DB74GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172HP Omen 17-w206ngGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHPMSI GE72 7RE-046GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NYMSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth ThinGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQGigabyte Aero 15X v8GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7MSI GV72 7RD-1048XPLGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, ADATA SX7000NP 128 GBDell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305GVega M GL / 870, i5-8305G, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256GHeat-7%11%19%18%12%32%25%Maximum Upper Side * -10% 5% 22%49 16%53 10% 27% 24%Maximum Bottom * 4% 3% 24%63 -6%65 -9% 35%40 33%Idle Upper Side * -7% 8% 9%24 31%26 26% 30%28 20%Idle Bottom *3743 -16% 26% 19%25 32%30 19% 37% 21%* ... smaller is betterSpeaker speakers are surprisingly good for a laptop. At their maximum volume just under 70 dB, the speakers remain clear, if quiet. The overall sound profile is also generally level. The weakest point is bass, which is anemic. A subwoofer would go a long way to completing the aural experience, but that would likely add some unwanted bulk. There is no unwarranted rattle or distortion, even at the highest volume. The speakers are pleasant enough that headphones may be optional for most users, but the volume will need to maxed to hear movies or games over the fans. dBA 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus GL703GE-ES73MSI GE72 7RE-046Frequency diagram checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devicesAsus GL703GE-ES73 audio analysis- not very loud speakers dBBass 100 - 315 Hz± reduced bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz+ balanced mids - only 3% away from median+ mids are linear delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz+ balanced highs - only away from median+ highs are linear delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz+ overall sound is linear difference to medianCompared to same class» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 87% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 47%Compared to all devices tested» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%MSI GE72 7RE-046 audio analysis+ speakers can play relatively loud 91 dBBass 100 - 315 Hz- nearly no bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz+ balanced mids - only away from median+ mids are linear delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz+ balanced highs - only away from median+ highs are linear delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz+ overall sound is linear difference to medianCompared to same class» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 76% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 47%Compared to all devices tested» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%When it comes to power consumption, the Asus GL703GE is a frugal device. Under full synthetic load, the machine pulls only 115 Watts from the wall. Even while gaming, power management is still good; power draw hovers around 123 Watts when playing demanding titles like The Witcher 3. Interestingly, the Omen 17 only pulls about 100 Watts during gameplay an 18% reduction but draws close to 150 Watts under full load. The included 180 Watt power brick is more than GL703GE-ES73i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, TN, 1920x1080, Strix GL703VM-DB74i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172, IPS, 1920x1080, Omen 17-w206ngi7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, GE72 7RE-046i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, TN LED, 1920x1080, Aero 15X v8i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, Consumption-13%4%-4%-9%Idle Minimum * -35%11 14%14 -9%14 -9%Idle Average * -20%18 1%20 -10%18 1%Idle Maximum * 7%24 3%25 -1%22 11%Load Average * 20%84 15%82 17%91 8%Witcher 3 ultra * 18%142 -16%Load Maximum * -38%146 -27%135 -18%173 -51%* ... smaller is betterPerhaps the weakest point of the GL703GE is its battery life. While not traditionally a strength of gaming laptops, recent devices like the Aero 15X v8 show that gaming laptops can be portable productivity machines as well. During our WiFi test, the GL703GE dies just before hitting the 5-hour mark. In contrast, the HP Omen 17 lasts over 6 hours with a similar battery. The GL703GE can be used when out and about, but you'll need to bring the power adapter along. Battery Runtime Idle without WLAN, min brightness 5h 47min WiFi Websurfing 4h 46min Load maximum brightness 0h 47min Asus GL703GE-ES73i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 64 WhAsus Strix GL703VM-DB74i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 WhHP Omen 17-w206ngi7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 WhMSI GE72 7RE-046i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, WhGigabyte Aero 15X v8i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, WhMSI GV72 7RD-1048XPLi5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, WhDell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305Gi5-8305G, Vega M GL / 870, 75 WhBattery Runtime-17%89%-36%144%-1%85%Reader / Idle347241 -31%795 129%762 120%345 -1%663 91%WiFi -34%380 33%184 -36%513 79%564 97%Load4753 13%96 104%156 232%78 66%WiFi200Pros+ well-built and attractive case + relatively slim and light + beautiful color-accurate display + 120 Hz refresh rate display makes for smooth gameplay provided fps can be pushed high enough + ample port selection + upgrades are simple + RGB keyboard offers good travel and firm feedback + heat and noise are well-managed + CPU and GPU remain relatively cool under stress + speakers are clear and level + Core i7-8750H offers significant bump in CPU performance Cons- pricey considering the competition - battery life is limiting - SSD is inconsistent and has slow write speeds - CPU performance gains don't make much difference in current games - CPU performance is lower than other Core i7-8750H laptops - Poor value compared to competitors The Asus GL703GE is, in essence, a refinement of Asus' 17-inch ROG Strix line. The GTX 1050 Ti variant checks a lot of boxes without leaving many things to slip through the cracks. The star of the show is without a doubt the Intel Core i7-8750H. The new hexa-core CPU is sure to make its way into most gaming notebooks this year, and while the GL703GE is a decent showing of the new processor's capabilities, it may not be the best. There is substantial improvement over the quad-core i7-7700HQ, but the GL703GE lags a bit behind other 8750H machines. Still, Coffee Lake brings the refresh that Intel's 45 Watt CPUs have needed for years and is sure to be hailed by gamers and other power users. While the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti isn't fully able to take advantage of the 8750H, it strikes a good balance between performance and efficiency. The 120 Hz display makes for an enticing device well-aimed at competitive gamers. Games look sharp and smooth, and some competitive titles can be pushed past 100 FPS to fully take advantage of the higher refresh rate. A GTX 1060 would offer better results at the expense of more heat and higher energy draw. The rest of the device remains an excellent said, Intel's new Coffee Lake Core i7-8750H is a boon for processor-intensive tasks. However, despite the new CPU being positioned as the selling point, the GTX 1050 Ti isn't quite the GPU the 8750H deserves. Unless you need the upgraded CPU for processor-heavy work, there is little reason to upgrade. At its MSRP of USD $1250, the GL703GE is a poor value for what it offers; the GPU seems a poor pairing for the processor. The GL703VM, which combines a GTX 1060 and Core i7-7700HQ, may be a better value at only $100 more. Asus GL703GE-ES73 - 05/12/2018 v6old Sam Medley Connectivity68 / 81 → 84% Application Performance94% Gaming - Weighted Average Pricecompare Sam Medley - Senior Tech Writer - 1258 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2016I've been a computer geek my entire life. After graduating college with a degree in Mathematics, I worked in finance and banking a few years before taking a job as a database administrator. I started working with Notebookcheck in October of 2016 and have enjoyed writing news and reviews. I've also written for other outlets including UltrabookReview and GeeksWorldWide, focusing on consumer guidance and video gaming. My areas of interest include the business side of technology, retro gaming, Linux, and innovative gadgets. When I'm not writing on electronics or tinkering with a device, I'm either outside with my family, enjoying a decade-old video game, or playing drums or piano. Sam Medley, 2018-05-15 Update 2018-05-15 Select Your Region Acessar para acessar conteúdo restrito Usando a pesquisa Você pode pesquisar facilmente em todo o site de diversas maneiras. Nome comercial Core i9 Número do documento 123456 Nome de código Alder Lake Operadores especiais “Ice Lake”, Ice AND Lake, Ice OR Lake, Ice* Links rápidos Também é possível experimentar os links rápidos abaixo para ver resultados das pesquisas mais populares. Informações sobre produto Suporte Drivers e software Pesquisas recentes Acessar para acessar conteúdo restrito Busca avançada Pesquisar apenas em Título Descrição ID do conteúdo Sign in to access restricted content. A versão do navegador que você está usando não é recomendada para este a possibilidade de fazer a atualização para a última versão do seu navegador clicando em um dos links a seguir. Safari Chrome Edge Firefox Conheça os processadores Intel mais recentes e experimente o desempenho aprimorado Não é possível carregar as informações sobre preços no momento. Comparar produtos Intel Essenciais Preço recomendado para o cliente Especificações da CPU Frequência da Tecnologia Intel Turbo Boost Frequência baseada em processador Frequência de TDP Configurável - baixo Informações complementares Opções integradas disponíveis Especificações de memória Tamanho máximo de memória de acordo com o tipo de memória Nº máximo de canais de memória Largura de banda máxima da memória Compatibilidade com memória ECC ‡ Gráficos de processador Gráficos do processador ‡ Frequência da base gráfica Máxima frequência dinâmica da placa gráfica Quantidade máxima de memória gráfica de vídeo Resolução máxima eDP - tela plana integrada‡ Tecnologia Intel InTru 3D Tecnologia de Alta Definição Intel Clear Video Intel Clear Video Technology Nº de monitores aceitos ‡ Opções de expansão Configurações PCI Express ‡ Nº máximo de linhas PCI Express Especificações de encapsulamento Configuração máxima da CPU Tecnologias avançadas Compatível com Intel Optane™ Memory ‡ Tecnologia Intel Speed Shift Tecnologia Intel Turbo Boost ‡ Tecnologia Hyper-Threading Intel ‡ Extensões do conjunto de instruções Intel Intel Intel AVX2 Tecnologia Intel My WiFi Tecnologia Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Tecnologias de monitoramento térmico Acesso de Memória Flexível Intel Tecnologia de proteção da identidade Intel Identity ‡ Segurança e confiabilidade Novas instruções Intel AES Intel Software Guard Extensions IntelSGX Intel Memory Protection Extensions Intel MPX Intel Trusted Execution Technology ‡ Bit de desativação de execução ‡ Programa Intel da Plataforma de Imagem Estável SIPP Tecnologia de virtualização Intel VT-x ‡ Tecnologia de virtualização Intel para E/S dirigida VT-d ‡ Intel VT-x com Tabelas de páginas estendidas EPT ‡ Todas as informações fornecidas estão sujeitas a alterações a qualquer momento, sem aviso prévio. A Intel pode alterar o ciclo de vida da fabricação, as especificações e as descrições dos produtos a qualquer momento, sem aviso prévio. As informações aqui contidas são fornecidas "no estado em que se encontram" e a Intel não atribui qualquer declaração ou garantias relacionadas à precisão das informações, nem sobre os recursos dos produtos, disponibilidade, funcionalidade ou compatibilidade dos produtos listados. Para obter mais informações sobre os produtos ou sistemas, entre em contato com o fornecedor do sistema. As classificações da Intel são apenas para fins gerais, educacionais e de planejamento e consistem nos números ECCN Número de Classificação de Controle de Exportações e HTS Programa de Tarifas Harmonizadas. Quaisquer usos das classificações da Intel são sem os recursos da Intel e não devem ser interpretados como uma representação ou garantia relacionada ao ECCN ou HTS apropriado. Como exportadora e/ou importadora, sua empresa é responsável por determinar a classificação correta de sua transação. Consulte a Ficha técnica para obter definições formais de propriedades e recursos de produtos. ‡ Este recurso pode não estar disponível em todos os sistemas de computação. Verifique com o fornecedor do sistema para determinar se seu sistema oferece este recurso ou consulte as especificações de seu sistema motherboard, processador, chipset, alimentação, HDD, controle gráfico, memória, BIOS, drivers, monitor de máquina virtual [VMM], software de plataforma e/ou sistema operacional para saber sobre a compatibilidade do recurso. A funcionalidade, o desempenho e outros benefícios deste recurso podem variar, dependendo das configurações do sistema. Os números dos processadores Intel não são indicação de desempenho. Os números dos processadores diferenciam recursos dentro de cada família de processador, e não entre famílias diferentes de processadores. Consulte para obter mais detalhes. O TDP máximo e do sistema se baseiam nos piores casos. O TDP real pode ser inferior, se nem todas as E/Ss para chipsets forem utilizadas. SKUs "anunciados" ainda não estão disponíveis. Favor consultar a data de lançamento para a disponibilidade no mercado. Frequência máxima de turbo refere-se à frequência máxima do processador de núcleo único que pode ser atingida com a Tecnologia Intel Turbo Boost. Mais informações estão disponíveis no site Consulte para obter mais informações, incluindo detalhes sobre quais processadores são compatíveis com a Tecnologia Hyper-Threading Intel. Os processadores compatíveis com a computação de 64 bits na arquitetura Intel requerem BIOS habilitados para arquitetura Intel 64. Consulte para sistemas compatíveis com a Tecnologia de proteção da identidade Intel. Alguns produtos suportam as novas instruções AES com uma atualização da Configuração do processador, em particular, i7-2630QM/i7-2635QM, i7-2670QM/i7-2675QM, i5-2430M/i5-2435M, i5-2410M/i5-2415M. Favor entrar em contato com o OEM para o BIOS que inclui a mais recente atualização da Configuração do processador. Date Published 03 Jun 2021 Intel Core i7-8750H NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB GDDR5 Full HD 1920 x 1080, 144 Hz, IPS 128GB SSD + 1000GB HDD 8GB DDR4, 2666 MHz kg lbs Pros 144 Hz screen selected models with narrow bezels 9 ms response time AUO82ED 95% sRGB coverage AUO82ED No PWM AUO82ED USB Type-C with Thunderbolt 3 support Comfortable port positioning Cons Poor battery life sample unit Gets rather hot after continuous gaming Specs HDD/SSD 128GB SSD + 1TB HDD, 7200 rpm Slot 1x 2280 PCIe x4 NVMe slot See photo RAM 8GB DDR4, 2666 MHz OS Windows 10 Home Body Material Plastic / Polycarbonate, Aluminum Dimensions 360 x 263 x 26 mm x x Weight kg lbs Ports and connectivity 2x USB Type-A Gen 1 5 Gbps 1x USB Type-A Gen 1 5 Gbps, Sleep and Charge 1x USB Type-C Gen 2 10 Gbps, Thunderbolt 3, DisplayPort, HDMI HDMI Mini DisplayPort Card Reader SD, SDHC, SDXC Ethernet LAN Gigabit LAN Wi-Fi 2x2 Bluetooth Audio jack Combo audio / microphone jack Features Fingerprint reader Web camera HP Wide Vision HD Backlit keyboard Microphone Dual-Array Microphone Speakers Bang & Olufsen dual speakers Optical drive Security Lock slot More HP OMEN 15 configurations - 199 laptops CommissionsEarned DISPLAY 1920 x 1080, IPS Name AUO AUO82ED HP Omen 15 2018 Diagonal Pixel density ppi Brightness cd/m2 sRGB 95% Panel Type IPS Resolution 1920 x 1080 Becomes "Retina" from 24 inches 62 cm Contrast 12601 dE Color Checker Buy our Profiles Buy our profiles for AUO AUO82ED HP Omen 15 2018 In addition to receiving efficient and health-friendly profiles, by buying LaptopMedia's products you also support the development of our labs, where we test devices in order to produce the most objective reviews possible. Office Work Office Work should be used mostly by users who spend most of the time looking at pieces of text, tables or just surfing. This profile aims to deliver better distinctness and clarity by keeping a flat gamma curve native color temperature and perceptually accurate colors. $ BUY NOW Design and Gaming This profile is aimed at designers who work with colors professionally, and for games and movies as well. Design and Gaming takes display panels to their limits, making them as accurate as possible in the sRGB IEC61966-2-1 standard for Web and HDTV, at white point D65. $ BUY NOW Health-Guard Health-Guard eliminates the harmful Pulse-Width Modulation PWM and reduces the negative Blue Light which affects our eyes and body. Since it’s custom tailored for every panel, it manages to keep the colors perceptually accurate. Health-Guard simulates paper so the pressure on the eyes is greatly reduced. $ BUY NOW HP OMEN 15 in-depth review HP is well-known for its selection of business computers. HP makes everything from portable notebooks like the Envy 13 to powerful mobile workstations like the ZBook series, however, another type of notebooks have gained popularity recently. We are talking about the Omen gaming series that has been proven over the last few years as a reliable gaming solution. Today we will take a look at the latest iteration of the series - the HP Omen 15 2018. Equipped with the new 8th gen Intel processors and up to a GTX 1070 Max-Q, the Omen 15 pumps some serious horsepower. Maybe the 144Hz display can set it apart from the competition or maybe it will win our hearts with its performance. Let's find out. You can check the prices and configurations in our Specs System Read the full review CPU Performance Intel Core i7-8750H 3D Rendering Results are from the Cinebench 20 CPU test the higher the score, the better GPU Performance NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB GDDR5 3DMark Fire Strike G Results are for the 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics benchmark the higher the score, the better LaptopMedia is a fully independent company. Almost all of the reviewed products come from online stores, instead of using review samples provided by the manufacturers. Our opinions are based on tests from our laboratory. Contact Us © LaptopMedia Ltd. - Some Rights Reserved. Long-lasting laptop with gaming power. The Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE can run all the latest games smoothly at 1080p. The long battery life proves to be a pleasant surprise. However, the notebook does not offer a lot of ports.“TUF” The Ultimate Force notebooks from Asus are intended for price-conscious buyers. In absolute terms, our review device that retails for 1200 Euros ~$1361 is not a very cheap notebook, but it finds its place right at the bottom of the gaming segment. This notebook is no stranger to us. We have already reviewed a sibling model known as the Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM. The competing devices include the Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52, the Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH and the Schenker XMG the FX705GE and the FX705GM are identically built, we shall skip the sections that deal with the case, connectivity, input devices and the speakers. Note There are a few small differences. You can find all the appropriate information in the review of the Asus TUF Gaming GB , DDR4 2666, single-channel, two RAM slots one slot occupied inch 169, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics IPS, glossy noMainboardIntel Cannon Lake HM370StorageSK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831, 128 GB , + Toshiba MQ04ABF100, 1089 GB freeSoundcardRealtek ALC233 Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVSConnections1 USB 2 USB / Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections combined audio jack, TPM RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN 10/100/1000MBit/s, Intel Wireless-AC 9560 a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/, Bluetooth x width x depth in mm x x = x x 11 inBattery64 Wh, 4240 mAh Lithium-Ion, VOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Home 64 BitCameraWebcam HDPrimary Camera MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers Stereo, Keyboard Chiclet-style, Keyboard Light yes, McAfee LiveSafe trail version, 24 Months kg = oz / pounds, Power Supply 479 g = oz / poundsNote The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar the FX705GM had a metal display lid, our current review device features a plastic display FX705GM had an RGB keyboard backlight. The FX705GE comes with a monochrome red keyboard FX705GE has a smaller fan grill. Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lake Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T DIN A4 ❌432 mm / 17 inch 290 mm / inch 29 mm / inch lbs419 mm / inch 289 mm / inch 27 mm / inch lbs413 mm / inch 305 mm / 12 inch mm / inch mm / inch mm / 11 inch mm / inch lbs297 mm / inch 210 mm / inch 1 mm / inch lbs 03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665TooltipAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf Ø650 547-681 Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf Ø643 499-661 Pixel arrangementThe matte display of the FX705GE operates with a native resolution of 1920x1080. The contrast ratio 10681 is good. However, the display brightness cd/m² could have been a little higher. We see a contrast ratio of 10001 and a screen brightness of at least 300 cd/m² as good. The competitors have slightly brighter displays. Positive The screen does not suffer from PWM flickering. 282cd/m²274cd/m²273cd/m²303cd/m²299cd/m²301cd/m²305cd/m²282cd/m²301cd/m² Distribution of brightnessAU Optronics i1Pro 2Maximum 305 cd/m² Nits Average cd/m² Minimum cd/m²Brightness Distribution 90 %Center on Battery 301 cd/m²Contrast 10681 Black cd/m²ΔE Color calibrated Greyscale sRGB Argyll 3D57% AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D sRGB Argyll 3D Display P3 Argyll 3DGamma TUF FX705GE-EW096TIPS, 1920x1080, Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HIPS, 1920x1080, XMG A707 Coffee LakeIPS, 1920x1080, Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6IPS, 1920x1080, TUF FX705GMIPS, 1920x1080, Display P3 5% 5% 6% -1% sRGB -2% -3% -1% 2% AdobeRGB 1998 -2% -3%63 -1% 0%Response Times10%8%15%73% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *39 ?21, 18 ? 186% ? ? ? Response Time Black / White *28 ?16, 1224 ?14, 1014% ? ? ? PWM Frequency119000 ?90122000 ?95Screen-36%-38%-43%8%Brightness 10%362 21%365 22%234 -22%Brightness291318 9%350 20%341 17%228 -22%Brightness Distribution9091 1%91 1%89 -1%85 -6%Black Level * -82% -4% -14% 29%Contrast1068645 -40%1248 17%1141 7%1170 10%Colorchecker dE 2000 * -63% -101% -116% 28%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * -93% -120% -134% 36%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * -55% -13% -5% 27%Greyscale dE 2000 * -79% -231% -251%2 8% 89% 103% 88% 83% 89%CCT6392 102%6911 94%7659 85%8066 81%6394 102%Color Space Percent of AdobeRGB 1998 -2%55 -4%56 -2%58 2%Color Space Percent of sRGB -3%84 -3%86 -1%89 2%Total Average Program / Settings-9% / -24%-10% / -25%-9% / -28%27% / 15%* ... smaller is better Screen Flickering / PWM Pulse-Width ModulationℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation PWM . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19200 minimum 5 - maximum 3846000 Hz was measured. Right out of the box, the color reproduction of the display is quite good. The DeltaE 2000 color deviation of misses the target value Delta E less than 3 by a very small margin. The display does not suffer from a bluish cast. The color reproduction can be improved only minimally by way of calibration. After calibration, the DeltaE 2000 sinks to and the grayscale looks significantly more balanced. The screen fails to cover both the sRGB 87% and the Adobe RGB 57% color spaces. By means of our color profile, the color reproduction can be improved. However before downloading it, you should make sure that your laptop has the same display model manufacturer + model number as our review device, because otherwise our color profile can result in worse color reproduction. Displays from different manufacturers can often be found within notebooks from the same model range. Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry ghosting. Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise↘ 12 ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 240 maximum ms. » 65 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices ms. ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise↘ 18 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 636 maximum ms. » 50 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices 35 ms. Asus has equipped the FX705GE with an IPS panel with stable viewing angles. Therefore, the screen content can be read from any position. The display brightness is only high enough for indoor use. Outside, the screen is readable only when the sun does not shine too FX705GE outdoors shot under the shining sunThe TUF Gaming FX705GE is a gaming notebook that can run all the latest titles in Full HD. Our review device can be had for 1200 Euros ~$1361. Other hardware configurations are also available. The prices start at 900 Euros ~$1020.The FX705GE offers the three following fan modes “Overboost”, “Balanced” and “Quiet”. These modes can be selected with the help of a function key. We used the “Balanced” mode for this review. However, we also conducted a few benchmarks in “Overboost” mode. There is not a lot of difference between the two modes in terms of performance. When we used the “Quiet” mode, the Turbo boost was utilized FX705GE comes with a Core i7-8750H. It is a high-end, hexa-core Coffee Lake CPU from Intel with a TDP of 45 watts. The processor has a base clock of GHz and a boost clock of GHz for six cores, 4 GHz for four cores and GHz for one/two cores. In the multi-core section of the Cinebench R15 benchmark, the processor runs at GHz the clock speed is the same in “Overboost” mode for a few seconds. Then the clock rate sinks to to GHz 3 to GHz in “Overboost” mode. In the single-core benchmark, the CPU operates at to GHz clock speeds are identical in “Overboost” mode. When running on battery power, the processor consistently operates at GHz. We check if the Turbo boost can be used over an extended period of time by running the Cinebench R15 multi-core benchmark in a continuous loop for 30 minutes. The results fall after the first benchmark run. After that they keep fluctuating between 1000 and 1070 points. The Turbo boost is utilized. Our review device achieves similar results when running in “Overboost” mode. However, when running in this mode, we observed fewer fluctuations. In “Quiet” mode, the results fluctuate between 770 and 820 points. 065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170TooltipAsus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H Ø1022 Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Overboost Ø1066 CPU clocks during the execution of the CB15 loopCinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit6236 Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit34168 Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit5456 Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit173 Points Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit1116 Points Cinebench R15 OpenGL fps Cinebench R15 Ref. Match % HelpCinebench R15 CPU Single 64BitAverage of class Gaming - 312, n=245, last 2 years 251 Points ∼77% +45%Asus TUF FX705GMIntel Core i7-8750H 175 Points ∼53% +1%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeIntel Core i7-8750H 174 Points ∼53% +1%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6Intel Core i5-8300H 173 Points ∼53% 0%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HIntel Core i7-8750H 173 Points ∼53% 0%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 173 Points ∼53% Average Intel Core i7-8750H 163 - 177, n=86 172 Points ∼52% -1% CPU Multi 64BitAverage of class Gaming 400 - 5663, n=244, last 2 years 2607 Points ∼27% +134%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HIntel Core i7-8750H 1230 Points ∼13% +10%Asus TUF FX705GMIntel Core i7-8750H 1137 Points ∼12% +2%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 1116 Points ∼11% Average Intel Core i7-8750H 863 - 1251, n=93 1113 Points ∼11% 0%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeIntel Core i7-8750H 1112 Points ∼11% 0%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6Intel Core i5-8300H 807 Points ∼8% -28%Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32BitAverage of class Gaming 5847 - 11940, n=24, last 2 years 8368 Points ∼51% +34%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 6236 - 6645, n=25 6479 Points ∼39% +4%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 6236 Points ∼38% Rendering Multiple CPUs 32BitAverage of class Gaming 30491 - 85088, n=24, last 2 years 52989 Points ∼38% +55%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 34168 Points ∼25% Average Intel Core i7-8750H 29664 - 35307, n=25 33163 Points ∼24% -3%Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core ScoreAverage Intel Core i7-8750H 20725 - 22665, n=13 21871 Points ∼27% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 21635 Points ∼27% 32 Bit Single-Core ScoreAverage Intel Core i7-8750H 3734 - 4163, n=13 3995 Points ∼78% +7%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 3734 Points ∼73% Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming last 2 years 38127 Points ∼93% +124%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 17048 - 22006, n=8 19665 Points ∼48% +15%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 17048 Points ∼42% 64 Bit Single-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming last 2 years 6453 Points ∼92% +42%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 4548 - 4997, n=8 4839 Points ∼69% +6%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 4548 Points ∼65% Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming 18976 - 71700, n=33, last 2 years 43914 Points ∼49% +143%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 17709 - 23313, n=17 21069 Points ∼23% +17%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 18068 Points ∼20% 64 Bit Single-Core ScoreAverage of class Gaming 5249 - 8936, n=33, last 2 years 7154 Points ∼74% +52%Average Intel Core i7-8750H 4669 - 5146, n=17 4982 Points ∼51% +6%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TIntel Core i7-8750H 4692 Points ∼48% The laptop is very responsive. We did not encounter any problems. The notebook revealed no issues related to system performance. The Intel Core i7-8750H is a hexa-core processor that offers more than enough computing power for applications that go far beyond gaming. It will not become obsolete for years. Thanks to the inclusion of a dedicated GPU, the Asus notebook can run video games. Our review device receives good results in the PCMark benchmarks. The system performance can be further increased by enabling dual-channel mode. Doing so will increase the performance by a few percentage points. PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 4230 pointsPCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 5038 pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 5461 pointsPCMark 10 Score 4975 pointsHelp PCMark 10 ScoreAverage of class Gaming 4477 - 9331, n=197, last 2 years 7264 Points ∼72% +46%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 5169 Points ∼51% +4%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 4982 Points ∼49% 0%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 4975 Points ∼49% Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 4532 - 5162, n=10 4851 Points ∼48% -2%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 4734 Points ∼47% -5% EssentialsAverage of class Gaming 7334 - 12176, n=196, last 2 years 10462 Points ∼81% +15%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 9110 Points ∼70% Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 8989 Points ∼69% -1%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 8791 Points ∼68% -4%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7142 - 9110, n=10 8371 Points ∼65% -8%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 7873 Points ∼61% -14% ProductivityAverage of class Gaming 6161 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years 9459 Points ∼75% +31%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 7201 Points ∼57% Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 7057 Points ∼56% -2%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 7025 Points ∼56% -2%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 6607 - 7332, n=10 6989 Points ∼55% -3%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 6920 Points ∼55% -4% Digital Content CreationAverage of class Gaming 5288 - 16424, n=196, last 2 years 10573 Points ∼53% +107%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 6071 Points ∼30% +19%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 5070 - 5616, n=10 5305 Points ∼27% +4%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 5290 Points ∼26% +4%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 5285 Points ∼26% +4%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 5096 Points ∼25% PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2Average of class Gaming 3570 - 6657, n=42, last 2 years 5109 Points ∼77% +21%Asus TUF FX705GMGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 4660 Points ∼70% +10%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND 4253 Points ∼64% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 4230 Points ∼64% Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB 4196 Points ∼63% -1%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 3894 - 4371, n=10 4162 Points ∼63% -2%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G 4148 Points ∼62% -2%An NVMe SSD from SK Hynix serves as the system drive. It comes in the form-factor and has a storage capacity of 128 GB. Straight out of the box, only 89 GB is available to the user. The rest of the storage space is occupied by the recovery partition and the Windows installation files. The transfer rates of the SSD are very good. NVMe SSDs achieve significantly faster transfer speeds than SATA-III models, because they are connected via PCI Express x4. The gaming notebook offers plenty of storage space. In addition to the SSD, Asus also put a HDD 1 TB, 5400 rpm inside the Read 868 MB/s Sequential Write MB/s Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TSK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HToshiba KBG30ZMT128GSchenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeSamsung SSD 970 EVO 250GBAcer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6Hynix HFS128G39TNDAsus TUF FX705GMWDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256GAverage SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 Average of class Gaming CrystalDiskMark / 6-36%132%-43%102%4%423% Write -21% 12% -31% 15% ? - n=320%208 ? - 363, n=161, last 2 years130% Read -19% 11% -38% 12% ?37 - 41, n=36%70 ? - n=161, last 2 years89% Write -60%1420 343% -58%1295 304%284 ?203 - 327, n=3-11%3255 ? - 9867, n=129, last 2 years916% Read Seq1012843 -17%1307 29% -52%1325 31%772 ?271 - 1033, n=3-24%3232 ?467 - 7955, n=129, last 2 years219% Write 4K -55% 37% -31% 44%239 ? - 269, n=321%544 ? - 1656, n=160, last 2 years176% Read 4K -28% 30% -23% 18%279 ?272 - 285, n=33%716 ?291 - 6332, n=160, last 2 years164% Write Seq -51%1533 470%136 -49%1301 384%303 ?269 - 321, n=313%4135 ?436 - 14960, n=161, last 2 years1438% Read Seq Q32T115951037 -35%3554 123%553 -65%1704 7%1597 ?1589 - 1606, n=30%5622 ?958 - 18690, n=161, last 2 years252%The Asus TUF FX705GE comes with Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. It is a mid-range, Pascal-based GPU. It has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, supports DirectX 12 and it runs at up to 1620 MHz. The results in the 3DMark benchmarks are on the normal level for this kind of GPU. The “Overboost” mode does not improve performance in any way. In addition to the GTX 1050 Ti, there is also Intel’s integrated UHD Graphics 630 on board. The laptop supports Nvidia’s Optimus technology that enables automatic switching between a dedicated and an integrated graphics adapter. In day-to-day use and when running on battery power, Intel’s graphics unit is used. Nvidia’s GPU is utilized when playing video games and running other graphically demanding applications. 3DMark 11 Performance 9298 points3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score 75191 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score 26828 points3DMark Fire Strike Score 6989 points3DMark Time Spy Score 2571 pointsHelp 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPUAverage of class Gaming 1029 - 72070, n=236, last 2 years 36561 Points ∼100% +286%Asus TUF FX705GMNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 13722 Points ∼38% +45%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 8304 - 10402, n=36 9591 Points ∼26% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 9466 Points ∼26% Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 9332 Points ∼26% -1%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H 9147 Points ∼25% -3%3DMark1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 781 - 53059, n=243, last 2 years 27044 Points ∼100% +247%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 7860 Points ∼29% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 7791 Points ∼29% Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 6792 - 8376, n=38 7743 Points ∼29% -1%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 7695 Points ∼28% -1%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H 7610 Points ∼28% -2%1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 15902 - 192520, n=169, last 2 years 122595 Points ∼100% +149%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H 51038 Points ∼42% +3%Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750HNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 50732 Points ∼41% +3%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee LakeNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 50128 Points ∼41% +2%Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 43721 - 53978, n=37 50013 Points ∼41% +1%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 49314 Points ∼40% 2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAverage of class Gaming 224 - 22547, n=243, last 2 years 10728 Points ∼100% +323%Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096TNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H 2536 Points ∼24% Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 1990 - 2536, n=16 2309 Points ∼22% -9%The CPU-GPU combination of the Asus notebook can run all the latest games smoothly. Our review device can achieve playable frames in most titles at 1080p resolution the screen resolution is also 1080p. In terms of graphics settings, you will have to stick to medium or high presets in most cases. There are only a few games that can run on the highest settings. Only titles that have low system requirements can be played at resolutions above 1080p you will need an external monitor to achieve resolutions higher than 1080p.The FX705GE does not ship with the latest Nvidia drivers. Our review device features the Nvidia GeForce WHQL drivers. You cannot download the latest driver package from Asus’s website. The Windows update function also does not offer any newer drivers. Unfortunately, the drivers downloaded directly from Nvidia’s website cannot be installed. It would appear as though only drivers that were customized by Asus can be ran the video game The Witcher 3 for one hour on the highest settings to see if the performance of the laptop falls during long gaming sessions. Over the entire run of gameplay, the player-controlled character stands still. We did not observe any frame-rate performance during the stress test with The Witcher 3When idle, the fans often stand still, which leads to silent operation - except when the hard drive is being accessed. Otherwise, the fans run at a low speed. However, under load, the fans really start to spin up. Here, we measured a sound pressure level of dBA. Under medium load, the system noise amounts to 43 dBA. Those who want less noise should enable the “Quiet” mode. In this mode, the fans operate less frequently and at lower speeds, which is why the boost clocks of the CPU are considerably lower. Unfortunately, our review device suffers from occasional coil whine. Noise Level Idle / / dBAHDD dBALoad 43 / dBA 30 dBsilent40 dBAaudible50 dBAloud min , med , max Audix TM1, Arta 15 cm distance environment noise dBA dBA 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096TThe FX705GE during the stress testThe FX705GE completes our stress test Prime95 and FurMark running continuously for at least one hour with different results. When plugged in, the CPU runs at to GHz and the GPU operates at 1500 to 1700 MHz. When running on battery power, the CPU is throttled down to 800 MHz and the core clock of the GPU fluctuates between 1000 and 1050 notebook does not become excessively hot. During the stress test, the 50 °C 122 °F mark is exceeded only at one measurement point. In everyday use, the temperatures always stay within reasonable bounds. The stress test is an extreme case scenario, which is very unlikely to occur in real life. We use it to test system stability. °C106 °C104 °C114 F °C87 °C128 F34 °C93 F °C79 °C78 °C80 F Maximum °C = 128 FAverage °C = 97 F °C94 °C107 °C112 °C78 °C90 °C86 F26 °C79 °C80 °C80 F Maximum °C = 112 FAverage 32 °C = 90 F Power Supply max. °C = 110 F Room Temperature °C = 74 F FIRT 550-Pocket± The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is °C / 97 F, compared to the average of °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.- The maximum temperature on the upper side is °C / 128 F, compared to the average of °C / 105 F, ranging from to °C for the class Gaming.± The bottom heats up to a maximum of °C / 112 F, compared to the average of °C / 110 F+ In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of °C / 93 F.+ The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of °C / F and are therefore cool to the touch. + The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was °C / 84 F + °C / F. dBA 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096TApple MacBook 12 Early 2016 GHzFrequency diagram checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devicesAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096T audio analysis± speaker loudness is average but good dBBass 100 - 315 Hz- nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz± reduced mids - on average lower than median± linearity of mids is average delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz± higher highs - on average higher than median+ highs are linear delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz- overall sound is not linear 30% difference to medianCompared to same class» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 2% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 47%Compared to all devices tested» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%Apple MacBook 12 Early 2016 GHz audio analysis+ speakers can play relatively loud dBBass 100 - 315 Hz± reduced bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz+ balanced mids - only away from median+ mids are linear delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz+ balanced highs - only 2% away from median+ highs are linear delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz+ overall sound is linear difference to medianCompared to same class» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 50%Compared to all devices tested» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%The power consumption is well within the normal range for this type of hardware. When idle, we measured a maximum power draw of watts. During the stress test, the energy consumption peaked at watts. The power output of the included AC adapter amounts to 120 watts. Note When idle, the notebook consumes less than half the power that its sibling model consumed. In all likelihood, this can be attributed to the fact that Nvidia’s Optimus technology did not function correctly on the sibling model. Our practically oriented Wi-Fi test simulates loads that are consistent with surfing the web. The “balanced” power plan is selected, the display brightness is set to 150 cd/m² and the energy-saving functions are switched off. The Asus TUF FX705GE achieves a battery runtime of 8 h 33 m, which is a very good result. Many office notebooks have shorter battery life. Our current review device lasts twice as long as its sibling model. We already mentioned the reason for this The sibling model consumes significantly more energy under low Runtime WiFi Websurfing Edge 44 8h 33min Battery Runtime - WiFi WebsurfingAsus TUF FX705GE-EW096Ti7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 64 Wh 513 min ∼19% Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750Hi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh 402 min ∼15% -22%Schenker XMG A707 Coffee Lakei7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh 378 min ∼14% -26%Average of class Gaming 57 - 745, n=184, last 2 years 363 min ∼14% -29%Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh 354 min ∼13% -31%Asus TUF FX705GMi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh 272 min ∼10% -47%Pros+ matte IPS screen + Full HD resolution + compact case + NVMe SSD + HDD + very good battery life + backlit keyboardCons- not a lot of ports - no USB Type-C - no SD card reader - a lot of noise under loadThe Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE-EW096T, provided courtesy of Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE is an entry-level gaming notebook. The combination of a Core i7-8750H and a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti can run all the games in our benchmark library smoothly. However, you will have to lower the resolution and graphics settings in some of the latest AAA titles in order to achieve playable frame Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE is a true gaming laptop that also works well as a notebook for daily tasks. However, it does not feature a lot of NVMe SSD helps create a very responsive system. Even though its capacity amounts only to 128 GB, there is no lack of storage space. The laptop features an additional 1 TB hard drive. Moreover, the notebook also comes with a usable, backlit keyboard. The FX705GE surprises when it comes to battery runtimes. In our Wi-Fi test, it lasts for 8 h 33 m, which is why it beats most office notebooks in terms of battery Full HD IPS screen has a matte surface, good contrast ratio and stable viewing angles. The brightness is okay. However, it could have been higher given the price tag of the FX705GE does not feature plenty of ports. Here, Asus chose to go the minimalist route to differentiate its more premium ROG gaming notebooks from cheaper TUF gaming laptops. The FX705GE has neither an SD card reader nor a USB Type-C port. Furthermore, it offers only one video output. Here, competitors with the same CPU-GPU combination such as the Schenker XMG A707 and the Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH offer significantly more. The Lenovo notebook actually comes with a Thunderbolt 3 port. Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T - 02/18/2019 v6old Sascha Mölck Connectivity47 / 81 → 58% Application Performance94% Gaming - Weighted Average Pricecompare Editor of the original article Sascha Mölck - Senior Tech Writer - 961 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012What started as a side job during my computer science studies later became my main job For more than 20 years now I have been working as an editor and author in the IT sector. While working in the print sector I also contributed to the creation of various loose-leaf publications and published original written pieces. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2012. Sascha Mölck, 2019-02-19 Update 2019-02-21

laptop i7 8750h gtx 1050